Integration architecture, scoped to your existing systems
Currently under research and development. Prototype capabilities, stack choices, and deployment status depend on each system and its access constraints; no integration or reliability result is implied here.
R&D Directions
Integration patterns to evaluate
CRM + AI Intelligence
An integration study could assess whether approved CRM data supports draft summaries or suggestions, with permissions and human review defined first.
Sales · RevOps · Customer SuccessDocument Intelligence
A retrieval prototype could test a bounded, approved document set. Access control, citation behavior, and retention need project-specific validation.
Legal · Finance · OperationsAPI + LLM Orchestration
An orchestration prototype could call explicitly permitted APIs and validate structured responses. It does not guarantee factual correctness or safe external actions.
SaaS · Platforms · EnterprisesDesign considerations
Boundaries before connectivity
- Existing API and identity boundaries
- Data flow and retention requirements
- Provider timeouts and usage metering
- Structured output validation
- Evaluation and failure handling
- Operational monitoring requirements
Technology in current work
Separate stacks, separate projects
- Python · Flask · Socket.IO · LangGraph (CEO R&D prototype)
- Next.js · React · TypeScript · Tailwind CSS (WayaLabs site)
- Provider selection and pricing verified per deployment
- Identity, retention, and egress boundaries defined per project
- Acceptance checks and operational monitoring agreed before release
Start with system boundaries
Share the systems involved and the access they require. We can discuss a research scope, integration risks, and how to test a candidate safely.